Thursday, November 6, 2008

Abortion compromise?

A family member and I were discussing abortion, and this is what I came up with.  He, even being anti-abortion, thinks it is a reasonable middle point.  Most Christians will not agree.

I certainly am as concerned about abortions as you are. It is unfortunate there have to be any, but so long as there is limited sex education in the schools (and at home) there will be young pregnant girls. And there will be pregnant women who don’t want any more kids. And the rare rape case. And those who are economically unable to support a kid (or more kids).

Sex education should be at home, but all too often it isn’t, so it is needed in the schools. If parents or schools don’t teach birth control (at the appropriate age) those youngsters raging hormones will overcome “just say no”, as you know!

Then there is the issue of when is a pregnancy a life that should be protected? Here is where the differences are problematic. I know the Christian perspective is when the sperm hits the egg – that’s a human. Some of the most aggressive pro-choice folks say abortion is OK anytime before the woman is dilated 10 cm. Neither position seems to make sense.

But there is a fuzzy middle ground (isn’t there always?).

Most scientists would say it is not a human life at conception, or even at the early stages of growth as an embryo. The courts say when it is “viable” to live outside the womb maybe it is a human life, but Drs. can always justify abortion to “save the mother”. Viability, of course, keeps getting earlier and earlier as medical procedures get better. I don’t know how early a preemie can be kept alive and has a chance at a healthy life, but I think it is now somewhere around 6 mo. of development.

I, being a devotee of science, certainly think an early abortion, morning after pill, etc., is OK. (Did you know that a fertilized egg takes about 4-5 days to implant in the wall of the uterus? And that something like ½ never implant and are just flushed out even after a certain number of cell divisions? Therefore, is God / nature the biggest abortionist according to the Christian definition of when life begins?) And abortion is fine with me during the early months when it is a tiny ball of cells, or even a fetus, that has no chance of survival outside the womb. It may sound callous, but to me that is just a group of cells no bigger than a wart or a boil – not human life worthy of being preserved.

So maybe a compromise can be made, and has been tried, where an early abortion is OK (of course, you have to define “early”) and after a certain point it is not OK except to save the mother. Then encourage birth control for all, start early for teens who are going to have sex anyway, make birth control easy, cheap, and not stigmatized, so the number of pregnancies is way reduced. As a back up encourage pregnant teens / women to come in early to get a preg test, find out the genetics of the fetus if they are concerned about some genetic abnormality, and if an abortion is what they choose, do it very early.

As we all know, some women will still be in denial about their pregnancy. Some will get late abortions illegally even if outlawed. Or go to Mexico. Or do it themselves at home. Great risk but the desperate will break the law whatever it is.

So, should I be king?

3 comments:

Uncle Tom said...

I must begin by stating what may be obvious to some. I'm interested in using this as a tool for discussion...not preaching. Lets ask thoughtful questions of one another and listen to the responses. Challenging one another to a deeper level of conversation. When a fact or emotion is revealed that is in oposition to another, I'm hoping we can refrain from verbally lam blasting one another. If my facts are wrong, please point them out to me and I will retract them or change my stance. One final thought. I used to see everything black and white. Right and wrong. Life experience has taught me to embrace the gray and leave the judging to God.

Now to the subject at hand. I hate abortion. It, like many things is destructive not only to a human life but to all who are involved. If I had a majic wand there would be none. But alas, that is not reality. As long as there is sexual drive, there will be babies. That's Gods plan. And may I add, quite an enjoyable plan. Thank you God! The circle of life by procreation. What then shall we do with the 'un-wanted' children?

Let me start with a comment building from SF original post. His candor is welcome and unlike other pro-choice voices actually embraces the thought of limiting abortion. I applaud this posibility and frankly embrace it. Could we simply begin as was suggested at limiting abortions to the first two trimesters? Most who are pro-life see this as caving, I choose to see it as a beginning to a longer conversation that could save childrens lives.

My second proposition is that we began building a comprehensive yet cost effective method to encourage
adoption in our country. I have no direct knowledge of cost, but have been told it is extremely costly. True? Yet I know there are many who desire a child. Building a bridge between accidental pregnacy and adoptive parents would be a posive solution.

SF Kid said...

Encourage adoption - great idea. So I made a whole new post about it.

Kathy in Alabama said...

Will email two articles, an old ('06) Anne Lamott essay and a recent news report, for your consideration.
I have some issues with a man saying that "abortion is destructive...to all who are involved." and that "As long as there is sexual drive there will be babies...God's plan...quite an enjoyable plan." I need to inquire of "Uncle Tom"...ever had an abortion? a period? a baby? ever had sex that wasn't "enjoyable" ??? p.s. these are RHETORICAL questions...please don't answer --but please do consider your unique perspective - and mine, as a woman. Thank you. Kathy in AL
___